Chapters 1 and 2 were finalised for distribution on Monday and then distributed after various difficulties.
After distribution, all references to serial must be updated. Subscriptions are now closed. Found that various items on the website that should be on permanent special were not including Terror on Every Side Volumes 1 and 2 eBooks. Frustrating and careless of me.
Jeremiah wrote a lament for Josiah (2 Chronicles 35:25). We don’t know at all what he wrote, so I tried to put together something which may or may not be similar, based on Jeremiah 8:18-22; 22:15-16; Lamentations 1:16; Zephaniah 1:14 and other snippets. Not satisfied with it. Have some more tries to improve it later.
Put the finishing touches to my attempt to reproduce a lamentation such as Jeremiah might have written.
Some connection with David’s lament over Saul and Jonathan also.
Printed copies of “Fiction Favours the Facts” arrived from the printers. What a blessing Made them properly available on the website and made eBook available on the website also.
Provided author information for Amazon so that the book are linked together and also linked with BibleTales.online.
Included attempt to explain how Josiah could have died in battle when he had been promised by God through Huldah that he would die in peace (2 Kings 22:20; 2 Chronicles 34:28).
Simply put, the explanation is that Josiah should not have sought battle when he had been promised peace to the end of his life. He had had peace from that time in the 18th year of his reign until the 31st year of his reign. It seems likely that he should have just accepted what Neco said or at least left him alone, even if he couldn’t believe that God had sent him to fight in the north.
In the time of Joshua, the elders had to make up their minds (or so they thought) and did not ask God (Joshua 9:14-15). Josiah was in the same sort of situation and he did not ask either.
As Isaiah put it “should not a people inquire of their God?” (Isaiah 8:19).
It is a common failing for us all and we all need to learn not to keep doing it. God does not mind us constantly asking him for help. He does mind if we don’t!
Eliakim is made king by Pharaoh Neco and is renamed Jehoiakim (2 Chronicles 36:4). Both names seem to mean roughly the same thing: God will establish, raise or develop. Why would Pharaoh do this? We are not told, but maybe it was to test his loyalty. If he stuck with the new name, Neco would “know” he was obeying. It would also be a constant reminder that he was answerable to Neco as his master.
There is no mention of whether Neco stayed and waited for the tribute to be paid, but I assume he did – to hurry its delivery. Imagine an army camped around Jerusalem eating, eating, eating. Everyone would have been eager to get rid of them by paying up as quickly as possible.
What happened to make a king into a king? Here is a quick list of the kings of Israel/Judah who were anointed and by whom.
Went over the parts of Jeremiah I believe to be in the time of Jehoiakim one more time to try to confirm the chronological order I have chosen. Some small changes again. I conclude that some are just guesswork where I am putting them in an order that suits me or that I think fits with the way God works. I really have no confidence in some of them at all.
Here are the events in the order I have chosen based on logic and guesswork:
When Jeremiah spoke to Jehoiakim the first time after he was made king, how did he feel? Until then, although many would have opposed his words, Josiah would have been generally sympathetic to Jeremiah’s words.
That comfortable protection was now gone. Of course, he still had God’s promise that he would be protected as long as he remained immovable in the face of all opposition.
All the same, I can imagine that he would have felt some trepidation.
I believe the most likely message to be God’s first words to Jehoiakim as king are Jeremiah 22:1-12. They start with a command of obedience to the weightier matters of the law with a heavy warning that if there is no obedience, destruction will follow.
Jeremiah 22:10 seems to refer to Josiah as “him who is dead”, and Shallum/Jehoahaz as “him who goes away” who would not return. Their times for choice were over, but Jehoiakim still had a chance to make a choice. God is patient and his prophets must deliver his warnings despite knowing the danger they face.
If a king ends up being given the burial of a donkey and none of his subjects is sad at his death, how quickly would that show up and in what way?
Jehoiakim was promised such a death (Jeremiah 22:18-19) and reigned 11 years. When did his nation start disliking him or wishing him gone?
I have assumed that it started right at the beginning of his reign, but hardened as he proved himself utterly unpleasant. Zephaniah 1:8-9 suggests that Jehoiakim dressed in foreign clothes, worshipped foreign gods and helped fill the palace with violence and fraud even during the time of Josiah.
The people already knew what they were getting as king.
Some time before the 4th year of Jehoiakim, he killed Uriah the prophet (Jeremiah 26:20-23). He seems to have been an arbitrary and violent man as well as being more interested in his palace than in ruling over the nation (Jeremiah 22:13-15).
The descriptions of Jehoiakim suggest he was one of the most unpopular kings Judah ever had and that this would have show out right from the start.
Today I was looking at the Rechabites.
Rechab
Rechab is not a very common name in the OT. References to a person named Rechab or Rechabites:
It seems that there are at least 3 people called Rechab.
If the house of Rechab in 1 Chronicles 2:55 is the same family as in Jeremiah 35, then the Rechabites were Kenites and scribes. There is no way to tell what time period this passage refers to. Judges 1:16 refers to a location in Judah for the Kenites, not the area that later became the northern kingdom of Israel.
Jehonadab is a variation of Jonadab. Probably the same person.
One objection to having the Rechabites working as scribes and living in a town is that Jonadab the son of Rechab forbade his descendants from living in houses, so they lived in tents. However, he also forbade them from sowing seed and having vineyards, so the job of a scribe would be one of the jobs they could have had when farming was excluded.
Jonadab lived in the time of King Jehu in the northern kingdom. If it is the same person, his descendants moved into Jerusalem only in the time of Jehoiakim.
Were they Israelites?
1 Chronicles 2:55 55 The clans also of the scribes who lived at Jabez: the Tirathites, the Shimeathites and the Sucathites. These are the Kenites who came from Hammath, the father of the house of Rechab.
Where is Jabez? Not mentioned anywhere else as a place. (Could have been named after the Jabez mentioned in 1 Chronicles 4:9-10.)
Hammath only occurs in one other place and there it is a place, not a person.
Kenites
Kenites were not Israelites. Or at least some weren’t.
I wonder if there is more than one group called Kenites. The land promised to Abraham included the land of the Kenites. It didn’t include the land of Midian and the Kenites seem to have entered with the Israelites and gone to live in the south of Judah.
Conclusions
I think the most likely conclusion is that the Rechabites referred to in 1 Chronicles 2:55 is probably not the same Rechabites referred to in Jeremiah 35. This cannot be proved and the strength of my conviction in this is not great.
I have not been distributing the diary for the last few days because it would have been revealing some details of the plot that I thought it was better not to reveal. That section is now finished and I can get on with other parts of the story.
Uriah was a prophet who was killed by Jehoiakim early in his reign (Jeremiah 26:20-23). Jehoiakim heard his message and tried to kill him but Uriah ran away to Egypt. Jehoiakim sent Elnathan the son of Achbor and others to bring him back from Egypt and then killed him.
Were Elnathan and the others aware of Jehoiakim’s plans? I would guess that they probably were not. Elnathan is mentioned in only one other place (Jeremiah 36:12) and in that situation he was with a group of officials who listened to Jeremiah’s message in fear (Jeremiah 36:16). Not only that, but he was one of three leaders who urged the king not to destroy the scroll Baruch had written (Jeremiah 36:25).
As a result, I would guess that they brought Uriah back expecting that he would be locked up or punished in some way, but not expecting him to be killed. It seems to me that Jehoiakim may well have killed Uriah himself.